Anil's Doublespeak

Religion is a very ‘phunny’ thing

While chatting with a friend recently, I mentioned that the whole concept of religion was one steaming pile of BS. Not only did I not get to explain my stand, I also got roundly chastised for having such irreverant views along with a solemn promise to beat me up the next time she saw me. I’m sure she was exaggerating her shock at my deviation from the path of being a nice Indian boy, but the shock was genuine. I have always wondered why religion arouses such strong emotions in people even though it is not possible to have any logical reason for such an attachment. Maybe it is like romance where you are (strangely enough) prepared to die (or kill) for a person who just happens to have the right pheromones wafting about him/her. The blind loyalty towards religion is even more mystifying since there isn’t anyone to produce those mind-altering pheromones (unless you are strongly turned on by one of those hairy preachers sweating it out in the sun as they deliver their god-or-hell speeches.. no, I didn’t think so).


Posted by Anil on March 28th, 2006 :: Filed under Uncategorized

Know thy enemy

By now anyone with half an eye open on the Internet knows Google’s China censorship story. While talking to a colleague recently I realized how badly the actions of Google have been misinterpreted, so here’s my little attempt at mythbusting the episode.

Myth: Google censored their website in China.
Truth: Google.com is still available to Chinese users. (Whether the Chinese government blocks it or not is another story). To allow Google to be available if the main site is blocked, they have offered a ‘censored’ version as Google.cn which follows local requirements.

Myth: Google reneged on their promise not to be evil.
Truth: Every search engine, including MSN and Yahoo! that operates in China has to censor results that are not acceptable to their government. However Google ensures that users know that they are getting filtered results, by mentioning it on every such result page.

Look at it this way: if people get only filtered results, they may be inclined to feel that those results reflect the truth, but if they are made aware that those results are filtered, then they will take the ‘truth’ with a pinch of salt.

Myth: Google did it so that they were greedy and wanted to profit from the huge Chinese market.
Truth: Google is a corporation and they are in the business of making profits. However they decided not to offer Blogger and Gmail in China because they did not want to compromise their users if records were requested. Not only that, they are also moving all search records out of China so that they will be inaccessible to the Chinese government. (Obviously it doesn’t want to repeat the Yahoo! episode where a blogger was sentenced to eight years after the company was made to provide evidence about him)

Then there’s the inevitable “If Google is not evil why should it continue to do business in China?”. That’s the equivalent of saying “Look here my Chinese friends, your government wants to give you only partial access to Google… so we in our infinite wisdom have decided that it’s better for you to not have any access to Google at all!”. The Internet was fine before Google and it will run fine without Google. If Google decides to stop operating in China, they will not not drop dead collectively – their life will go on as usual, and their search needs will be met by local companies like Baidu.com which will happily provide only the results that are acceptable to their government, without any intimation that there’s more to the truth than what’s available to them.

Many people are happy to see the great enemy in Google, but they are just following local law. Remember that they censor results in many countries as per local law (DMCA violations in the United States and Nazi-related pages in Germany and France), but in each case they ensure that users are aware of those takedowns. If you find these actions disturbing, rail against the laws that cause them, not the law abiding companies that have to follow them.

Related: Google’s official explanation of ‘censorship’ decision. A good read.


Posted by Anil on March 7th, 2006 :: Filed under Uncategorized