»Tuesday, October 30, 2007

More about cellphones

One of the things I look forward to every day is reading the Wall Street Journal. To my mind, it brings back the days when the first thing I did every day was to read the newspaper. (The Times of India, before they morphed their print edition into a tabloid and also created one of the worst ad-infested websites I've seen) The downside is that if I find a great story, I can't send it to my friends since the online version is subscriber-only. Thankfully the Mossberg columns are available on his blog, so if you haven't seen or read his timely rant about the state of the cellphone service industry in the US, please do so now.

Apart from all the usual criticisms of the way cellphone services operate in the US, there's one that is strangely accepted - the fact that incoming text messages are charged! Leave aside the fact that text messaging is ridiculously expensive (when it is so cheap for the carrier to provide the service) - it is strange that folks are charged for incoming messages when there is no way to block text messages from appearing. At least you can refuse to answer an incoming call - there is no way to decline a text message, and if you have friends who love their unlimited text messaging plans (I know, I was one of them until recently), you can rack up charges for no fault of yours.

I can't wait for the rumored gPhone to shake up the way the cellphone industry works.

Labels: , , ,



...
Anonymous Anonymous says..

Uh u cant email articles? are u reading WSJ online from a PC/Linux/MAC box ?
If yes then you can send links to your friends from the WSJ website , i do it all the time . click on the Email link that appears near the top right corner. ( Email , Print , Most Popular , they appear together ). The recipient receives a link for the article via email . the link is valid for 7 days i believe.

If you want to go low-tech , use one of the print to pdf softwares and email the PDF's , but i am sure that will violate some copyright law.

This is their way of getting more subscribers , free but very effective adveritisement for WSJ Online i say.
Blogger Anil says..

I could email articles, but I hate links that die after a while. It's not as if the WSJ is an ad-free website, so I fail to see why they can't just give access for free and make money from ads like every other news website. I'd be happy to drive traffic their way, but not if they kill the links after a week.

I could create PDFs, but as you mentioned, I'd be violating their copyright, especially if I send emails within a corporate environment.

They do have their quirks, but it's the only readable newspaper I have seen in a while, so I'm not gonna complain about it.
Anonymous Anonymous says..

I can think of a couple of reasons why they chose to remain a pay site


1. 99.9999% of their target client base can afford the fee. i think the business thumb rule is to charge what you think the customer can pay , not how much it costs you to make it

2. remain a high income demographic site which can bring them big bucks from the advertisers. There is an article on WSJ about Fox Business Channel that explains how CNBC charges big ad rates even though their ratings are very low. In malayalam we can say "kanda aappa oopakal keri nerangalullathalla ee WSJ.com" :)

Post a Comment

What to do next

Also on this site

Latest Photos

  • www.flickr.com
  • » View Gallery

Stuff I read